A JURY in London acquitted two men charged with insider trading, dealing a blow to the UK Financial Services Authority as it strives to showcase a new tough-on-crime persona.
The FSA had charged Peter Andrew King and Michael McFall with insider trading in advance of a June 2006 pharmaceuticals deal, but the London jury yesterday delivered a not-guilty verdict in less than two hours.
The acquittals overshadowed the FSA’s announcement earlier in the day that it had slapped a JP Morgan Chase unit with a 33.32 million ($57.8m) penalty, the regulator’s largest-ever fine, for failing to separate client money from the firm’s accounts.
The FSA said it expected to bring similar cases against other banks in coming weeks.
After years of rarely filing criminal charges, the agency once derided for being a toothless regulator of The City of London has revved up its law-enforcement efforts with a recent flurry of arrests, police raids, criminal charges and other headline-grabbing actions. But the FSA has successfully prosecuted only a handful of criminal cases, mostly against small-time offenders, and it is under pressure to show that it can win a major case.
The swift loss of its most recent insider-trading case stunned FSA officials, who believed that the complex case would take the jury days to decide.
FSA enforcement chief Margaret Cole said that insider-trading cases are notoriously tough to prove and that “we remain 100 per cent committed to the strategy of achieving credible deterrence”.
The acquittal comes at an inopportune time for the FSA. Doubts are swirling about the agency’s future as the UK’s new coalition government eyes an overhaul of the country’s regulatory apparatus.
In the JP Morgan case, the FSA said that over a nearly seven-year period the US bank’s JPMorgan Securities unit, based in the UK, failed to properly segregate billions of dollars in institutional clients’ money from the company’s own funds.
“Had the firm become insolvent at any time during this period, this client money would have been at risk of loss,” the agency said, calling the mistake “a serious breach of our client money rules”.
The agency said JP Morgan reported the problem when it was discovered and that the error wasn’t deliberate.
Clients didn’t lose any money and the mistake didn’t result in any incorrect financial reporting, the FSA said.
A JP Morgan spokesman declined to comment.
“This is a staggering fine for what is in effect an administrative oversight. If this doesn’t serve to wake up every senior manager to check that he or she has carefully identified all risks and is properly managing them, then nothing will,” said Simon Morris, a partner at London law firm CMS Cameron McKenna.
The FSA said the penalty was appropriate because as much as $US23 billion ($27.3bn) in client funds were improperly intermingled with JP Morgan’s own funds.
The fine would have been 47.6 million if JP Morgan hadn’t agreed to resolve the case at an early stage, which made it eligible for the FSA’s standard 30 per cent discount for speedy settlements.
The FSA’s previous largest fine was 17m against Royal Dutch Shell in 2004 for market abuse.