THIS time last year, after a strong asset price recovery, ANZ Bank chief executive Mike Smith warned the global financial crisis was not over.
Smith’s prediction of a series of aftershocks lasting up to five years now looks like it’s on the money, as Europe’s debt crisis rolls through Ireland, Greece and Portugal, and potentially on to Spain and Italy.
Australia, happily hitched to fast-growing Asia, stands to one side, although ANZ is not immune to the threat of volatile funding markets or, indeed, the smorgasbord of regional opportunities presented by a stressed global banking system.
“I think instability in the markets is going to be an issue in 2011, particularly for the credit markets,” Smith says in an exclusive interview with The Weekend Australian.
“Equity markets might not be as bad because they’re getting used to this kind of aftershock, but every time it happens to the credit markets they get whacked.
“The cost of wholesale funding is clearly going to be an issue for Australian banks.”
So get set for another round of sabre-rattling in Canberra, as banks pass on their higher costs to customers in the form of out-of-cycle rate rises.
Bank-bashing will only intensify ahead of the March 31 release of a report by the Senate committee investigating the sector’s competitiveness.
Volatility, though, also presents an opportunity for acquisition-hungry ANZ.
Smith firmly believes the European debt crisis has only just begun and will “get ugly before it gets any better”.
He says Portugal and Spain will have to confront their own versions of the mess that led to Ireland’s E85 billion ($108bn) bailout by the European Union and the International Monetary Fund.
As for Greece, it was destined to “come back to the party”, because there was no sign of the required structural changes to rectify the situation.
The opportunities for ANZ become clear when you overlay a capital-lite European banking system, which is already holding too much impaired sovereign debt, with the tighter rules for bank balance sheets under the so-called Basel III process.
It was a similar level of pressure that enabled ANZ to pick up select Royal Bank of Scotland assets in Asia for $US550 million in 2009.
“I think there will be another call for capital if there’s a haircut on these bonds, and why shouldn’t there be?” Smith says. “Somebody’s got to take some pain if you reschedule a country’s debt and I suspect it will be the banks, which means there will be pressure on them to divest businesses which are not domestic.
“Taxpayers will be saying: ‘We’ve poured all this money into you guys and you’re not providing enough oxygen for the domestic economy’. I think this theme is going to be running for a couple of years, and it’s going to throw up a few opportunities for us.”
Smith, though, says the only caveat is what happens to prices.
Over the past few years, ANZ has enjoyed a relatively free run at regional M&A, as one of the few global banks with the inclination as well as the balance sheet to build a meaningful Asian presence. Through this period, according to Smith, ANZ was able to offer some “cheeky prices”.
But it won’t always enjoy that luxury and must maintain its financial discipline or risk losing market support for the super-regional strategy.
The failed $3.8bn tilt for Korea Exchange Bank is a case in point.
While a setback on the face of it, ANZ’s reputation was enhanced by refusing to match Hana Financial Group’s successful $4.2bn offer, although there have been suggestions that Smith’s team was “blindsided” by the late emergence of the local player.
“I don’t think we were blindsided so much as pragmatic and realistic to the idea that, if a Korean bank came into the equation, then we wouldn’t be able to match it because we wouldn’t have the synergies they’d have,” the ANZ chief says.
Smith also had a go at acquiring KEB when he was at HSBC.
In an indicator of how much values have fallen, HSBC said in September 2007 that it had agreed to acquire the same 51 per cent stake from US private equity firm Lone Star for $US6.3bn.
But Smith then left to join ANZ, and the crisis hit.
“Obviously it isn’t meant to be,” the ANZ boss jokes.
Locally, the bank surprised the market in October with a 53 per cent jump in full-year profit from $2.94bn to $4.5bn, as a strong margin performance enabled ANZ to exceed consensus forecasts by about 5 per cent.
The result precipitated another round of bank switching, as Westpac and Commonwealth Bank investors piled into ANZ.
One of the big questions to emerge from the result was the sustainability of the bank’s net interest margin, which improved five basis points to 2.5 per cent.
As UBS analyst Jonathan Mott notes, ANZ’s margin has expanded by 51 basis points since the first half of 2008 compared with only seven basis points for the rest of the sector.
While ANZ’s local business is skewed towards higher-margin business lending, Mott says ANZ’s margin is now 25 basis points higher than its nearest rival — the nation’s biggest business bank, National Australia Bank.
“No bank has ever held a margin lead over its competitors as wide as ANZ at present,” Mott says, suggesting the difference is partly explained by the bank’s repricing of its business book.
Smith agrees that ANZ repriced “quite aggressively”.
But the low-yielding part of the institutional balance sheet was also downsized, as large corporates deleveraged to reduce risk.
Other factors included repricing of previously fixed residential mortgages in New Zealand, and alleviated funding cost pressures from ANZ’s ability to tap $13bn in surplus customer savings in Asia.
Smith, meanwhile, is adamant that ANZ has made the right decision in standing aside from the core banking system upgrades that are being undertaken by his rivals.
It’s a decision that’s raising industry eyebrows all the more after NAB’s prolonged software outage that continues to cause grief for customers.
But the ANZ boss is unrepentant, saying he has never been a believer in big-bang information technology projects.
“I’ve never seen it done well, ever, by any bank,” he says.
“We’ve just agreed on a template for our architecture for the next 25 years, and what we have to do is simplify what we’ve got and then at some stage we’ll be replacing parts of our system.
“ANZ has a very different business model and business mix, so a big catch-all retail system is not as appropriate for us as it is for Commonwealth Bank, for example.”
That said, ANZ is rolling out a big Asian IT project and is consolidating two systems into one in New Zealand.
So technology won’t be the challenge for ANZ that it is for the other majors.